Foster Death Coverup, and the Press

As I’ve said before, this was a critical time in the Clinton Administration, very early.  1993.  Seems as some will say “ancient history” but it demonstrates clearly just how far people will go to cover up truth.   I’ll be posting later Ann Barnhardt’s last video in which she describes “diabolical narcissism” and how it has affected the nation.  I see it here in this episode, all the way through.  It’s not just the leaders, it’s the layer of malignant bureaucracy that follow them that will remain, even if the head of the snake is cut off!

I’m hopeful that Mr. Trump will open up this can of worms, to display for all to see, just how sick media and the national press have become.

Here’s the just released FBICover-up video, and I’ll follow that with the Allan Favish radio interview.  Please, take the time!  Everyone needs to know just how deep is the corruption and disease is that infects those in power.

 

Here’s the Favish radio interview.  Very illuminating.  Allan Favish was working for Judicial Watch in DC during the early days of this massive cover-up.  His work should be noticed by media.  Rather, most of the hero’s of this indepth investigation are ignored, and vilified by those in power positions.  Patrick Knowlton and Ambrose Evans Pritchard were actually even deliberately intimidated.

http://www.trunews.com/trunews-051216-allan-favish-vince-fosters-clinton-arkancide/

Now, whether or not you want to believe Rick Wiles and the things he injected into the interview is totally up to you.  But what Favish claims and testifies to is truth, not AJF streetspeculation.  His site has the documents of his lawsuit, and you need to read the pages he indicates.

Don’t believe the nonsense that this is all just vast rightwing conspiracy crap.  Take the time and look at the evidence.

Sources:  fbicover-up.com, trunews.com, and allanfavish.com.

 

  • David Martin

    Allan Favish in his radio interview speaks of Starr investigator Miguel Rodriguez’s resignation letter and later his critical internal memo that he says was posted on the Internet at fbicover-up.com and ignored by the press. He is right that these critical documents were ignored by the press, but they were posted by me at my web site, not at fbicover-up.com. That web site was rather dormant until recently when Hugh Turley revamped it. Here is the resignation letter and my article about it: http://www.dcdave.com/article5/091217.htm and here is the Rodriguez memo and my article about it: http://dcdave.com/article5/130926.htm

    There are now links to these articles at fbicover-up.com, but they were put up just this year. A full listing of my Vince Foster articles is here: http://ariwatch.com/Links/DCDave.htm#VinceFoster My site and fbicover-up.com are, to my mind, the best resources for information on the Vince Foster case. Mike Rivero’s WhatRealllyHappened.com at http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/FOSTER_COVERUP/foster.php#axzz48d6wS91I is also quite good.

  • David Martin
  • Eddie Clever

    Favish is either careless or deliberate when he said there were “wounds” (plural) to Foster’s neck. When Favish argued before the Supreme Court he failed to mention the best evidence of the neck wound (singular). Evidence of the neck wound was included in Starr’s Report. Exhibit 5, that was ordered included in Starr’s Report, by the US Court of Appeals presents the Medical Examiner’s Report and the deposition of a paramedic that both mentioned the neck wound. Favish, has a talent for bending the nail by never hitting it squarely on the head.

  • Pingback: Patrick Knowlton | Cucumber Lodge()

  • David Martin

    Hear Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, the British reporter mentioned in the Foster video, talk about America’s “decadent and dishonest leadership class” as exhibited by the Foster and Oklahoma City bombing cover-ups on Public Television’s Booknotes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACyGsAAjfCI